copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Techmeme: Pangram Labs: ~21% of the 75,800 peer reviews . . . Pangram Labs: ~21% of the 75,800 peer reviews submitted for ICLR 2026, a major ML conference, were fully AI-generated, and 50%+ contained signs of AI use — By - Miryam Naddaf 0 — Miryam Naddaf is a science writer based in London
ICLR Conference: AI-Generated Reviews Spark Controversy AI text detection company Pangram Labs analyzes all 19,490 papers submitted to ICLR and 75,800 reviews, publishing the results on its blog As a result, 21% of the paper reviews are found to be written entirely by AI Screenshot from Pangram Labs blog Controversy has erupted after it was revealed
ICLR updates on LLM-generated papers and reviews - LinkedIn Pangram Labs analyzed all ICLR reviews: https: lnkd in dcdrt9Qt Their classifier distinguishes: Fully AI-generated, Heavily AI-edited, Moderately AI-edited, Lightly AI-edited, and Fully human
ICLR 2026 Response to LLM-Generated Papers and Reviews In the past few days, there have been many concerns raised about potential LLM-generated papers and low quality LLM-generated reviews We take these concerns seriously, and we want to update the community on the steps we are taking and will be taking over the next two weeks These steps below are based on the policies we outlined in our previous blog post: Policies on Large Language Model