copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Techmeme: Pangram Labs: ~21% of the 75,800 peer reviews . . . Pangram Labs: ~21% of the 75,800 peer reviews submitted for ICLR 2026, a major ML conference, were fully AI-generated, and 50%+ contained signs of AI use — By - Miryam Naddaf 0 — Miryam Naddaf is a science writer based in London
ICLR 2026 Scandal: 21% of Peer Reviews AI-Generated, Raising . . . A scandal at the 2026 ICLR conference revealed that 21% of peer reviews were fully AI-generated, exposing vulnerabilities in academic integrity amid rising submissions and reviewer workloads This trend sparks ethical debates and calls for stricter guidelines Conferences are experimenting with hybrid systems to balance efficiency and trust
ICLR updates on LLM-generated papers and reviews - LinkedIn Pangram Labs analyzed all ICLR reviews: https: lnkd in dcdrt9Qt Their classifier distinguishes: Fully AI-generated, Heavily AI-edited, Moderately AI-edited, Lightly AI-edited, and Fully human
ICLR Watermarking for AI-Generated Content Detection: A . . . Poster session B in Workshop: ICLR 2025 Workshop on GenAI Watermarking (WMARK) Watermarking for AI-Generated Content Detection: A Review on Text, Visual, and Audio Modalities Lele Cao [ Abstract ] [ Project Page ] [ OpenReview]