copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
Khan v. Figma, Inc. (3:25-cv-10054), California Northern District Court ORDER REASSIGNING CASE IT IS ORDERED that this case is reassigned using a proportionate, random and blind system pursuant to General Order No 44 to Judge Charles R Breyer Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to the case
Khan v. Figma, Inc. 3:2025cv10054 | U. S. District Court for the . . . Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties
Figma sued for allegedly misusing customer data for AI training Design software company Figma was hit with a proposed class action in California federal court on Friday for allegedly misusing its customers' designs to train artificial intelligence models
Class action alleges Figma used user designs to train AI tools Figma, the web-based collaborative design platform, is facing a proposed class action lawsuit in a U S federal court, accused of using its customers’ proprietary design data to train its
Khan v. Figma, Inc. - Law360 Parties, docket activity and news coverage of federal case Khan v Figma, Inc , case number 3:25-cv-10054, from California Northern Court
Khan v Figma, Inc - UniCourt Case Summary On 11 21 2025 Khan filed a Commercial and Trade - Contract lawsuit against Figma, Inc This case was filed in U S District Courts, California Northern District The Judge overseeing this case is Sallie Kim The case status is Open
Khan v. Figma, Inc. | Law. com Radar The suit alleges Figma misappropriated trade secrets, breached its contract and violated federal and California laws after pivoting to AI to boost its valuation following Adobe’s failed