copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
The Recourse Rule, Regulatory Arbitrage, and the Financial Crisis In November 2001, bank regulators finalized the so-called Recourse Rule, which lowered risk weights from 1 to 0 5 for A-rated and to 0 2 for AAA- and AA-rated private-label securitization tranches
The Recourse Rule and the Crisis: A Case Study of the Unintended . . . The 2007–2009 finan-cial crisis revealed such a possibility for a particular regulation: the so-called Recourse Rule 1 After that rule reduced bank capital requirements for a narrow class of financial products, including those at the heart of the crisis, some bank holding companies (BHCs)—the legal structure within which many banks operate—incre
Recourse vs. Non-Recourse Loan: Whats the Difference? Both recourse and non-recourse loans allow lenders to seize collateralized assets after a borrower fails to repay a loan After collateral is collected, lenders of recourse loans may go after
The Miller Act: How to Handle Non-Payment as a Federal Subcontractor What is the Miller Act? The Miller Act provides a way for subcontractors to recover unpaid earnings on federal projects Subcontractors go into business with Prime Contractors or higher tier federal subcontractors, and there are cases where subcontractors do not get paid for a multitude of reasons
Debunking Millar v. Taylor: The History of the Prohibition of . . . The generally accepted belief about the rule prohibiting recourse to legislative history as an aid to statutory interpretation is that it began in the case of Millar v Taylor in 1769, and it was followed thereafter in England and throughout the United States through to the 20th century
Payment Bond Claims under The Miller Act and The Little Miller Act For securing a recovery on a public construction project, the unpaid subcontractor must rely on the federal Miller Act (for federal construction projects) or the North Carolina "Little Miller Act" (for State of North Carolina construction projects) Generally What is commonly known as the Miller Act is codified at 40 U S C §§ 3131-3134
Millar v Taylor as a Precedent for Statutory Interpretation Abstract It is commonly believed that the rule forbidding recourse to legislative historyi as an aid to statutory interpretation began in 1769 with the case of Millar v Taylor ii Justice Frankfurter’s view is representative: In Millar v
Recourse vs. Non-Recourse Loan: Key Differences Explained What is a recourse loan? A recourse loan holds you personally responsible for repaying the debt, even if selling the property after foreclosure doesn’t cover the full balance
The Recourse Rule, Regulatory Arbitrage, and the Financial Crisis In “The Recourse Rule, Regulatory Arbitrage, and the Financial Crisis,” Stephen Matteo Miller, a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, investigates the unintended consequences of the change in regulatory capital requirements and how the change might shed light on the demand-side factors of the financial