copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
No, not, and non - English Language Usage Stack Exchange At the linguistics conference, there were no not non- native speakers of Esperanto They're all grammatically "valid", but they all mean different things - and pragmatically idiomatically, only the no version is likely to be used
Order of not with infinitive - English Language Usage Stack Exchange The sentence with not between to and the verb (do in this case) is a special case of the split infinitive construction According to CGEL, 2 3 Secondary verb negation, p 803, these two sentences are semantically equivalent, and either is acceptable
grammar - Should we use not to or to not? - English Language . . . You can certainly say it's not OK to not learn from them However, bear in mind that there are still people around who mistakenly believe that such a construction is a split infinitive and should be avoided (They are mistaken because the particle to is not part of the verb so there’s nothing to split ) If you think your readers or listeners may be of this persuasion, you may want to
But or But Not? - English Language Usage Stack Exchange I brought my luggage but I didn't bring my passport Which one of the following is equivalent? I brought my luggage but not my passport I brought my luggage but my passport
parts of speech - When to use not to and to not - English Language . . . In a word, yes Some people make distinctions between them, and some people used to condemn the ones with to not (for reasons that were never clear, but that's faith for you), but in fact the order is normally a matter of individual style Unless there's special intonation and stress involved; in that case, all bets are off
grammaticality - It is not . . . but . . . (correct structure) - English . . . But that presumption does not remove the dissonance or the possibility of misunderstanding In the expression there is or ought to be a rule that where we are dealing with legal, scientific, technical or logical matters, precision trumps brevity and elegance
grammaticality - Whether or not vs. whether - English Language . . . As Henry Higgins observed in Pygmallion, the best grammarians are often those who learned English in school as immigrants My parents, who were first-generation Americans in the early 20th century, learned English grammar in NYC public schools meticulously They insisted "whether or not" is proper usage, period Over time, language evolves or erodes and the rules change, which really means
No vs not any - English Language Usage Stack Exchange Not any cannot normally be used with subjects, so no and none of appear instead: No brand of cigarette is harmless No tourists ever came here No one (also no-one in BrE) means nobody and cannot be followed by of For ‘ not a single one (of)’, we can use none (of), not any (of) or not one (of) (more emphatic), but no one is not used in this way
What is the difference between Dont be. . . and Be not. . . ? The "Be not" construction is simply more poetic It hearkens back to lines like "Death be not proud" from John Donne in the 17th century, or Shakespeare's "Be not afraid of greatness " In most contexts, "do" is strictly an auxiliary verb It's used colloquially in sentences like "don't be alarmed", but doesn't actually carry any meaning
A question of not this one - English Language Usage Stack Exchange As it stands "Not this one" is not a sentence because it has neither a subject nor a verb If someone says "Not this one" they are usually using a shortened form of a full sentence where 'not' modifies a verb and 'this one' is the object of the verb An example of such a sentence would be: The one you need is not this one You might hear this in a warehouse where orders are being picked and the