copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
Did Aristotle say The more you know. . . I found cites, though nothing specific, to Socrates, Lao-Tse, George Bernard Shaw, and Aristotle I did some word searches in the works reprinted at Project Gutenberg
Is there a philosophy which argues that nothing exists? Is or was there a philosophy which examines a hypothesis that in fact nothing "exists" except maybe questions? I know there are philosophies that state that reality is a simulation etc but I mean
Nothingness cannot be. Does that imply something must be? If nothing existed, for example as an empty set, then something would exist, the empty set, in any possible way that can be If something exist we cannot say that nothing exists
logic - If the universe came from nothing, why is it assumed that . . . In your question, given that the universe came from nothing "is it not possible that we can live once again from nothing?" a similar argument can be applied Taking the fact that the universe "came from nothing" as a given, we can ask what that means The universe took a while to organize itself - in the mean time there was little "information
Is Nothing actually imaginable? - Philosophy Stack Exchange Sometimes, answers are simple Nothing cannot be imagined because one does not imagine absences of anything, only things (which may lack something, but then you are merely imagining a thing without another thing) @SAHornickel - Not imagining anything is not the same as imagining nothing Imagining-something is an act with an object, while a lack of imagining-something is not an act, and is
Is there anything that is totally random? - Philosophy Stack Exchange And once we accept that at least one state could be random because it had to be random because nothing came before and it could not therefore be the consequence of anything, then we can also accept that maybe there are plenty of randomness around even if it is not apparent And this is of course what quantum randomness implies
Is this proof that the universe came from nothing valid? The universe didn't "come from" nothing, because the words "come from" have no meaning outside of the universe That would be the scientific position that you can't use concepts relating to time and space outside of time and space Based on the former point, you can't assume that a universe can't create itself
philosophy of science - If nothing happens, does time still pass . . . There is never a situation where "nothing happens", there are situations where you may think "nothing is happening" but constantly something is happening, particles are always moving, they never stop, even without there being someone to "define" time, time will exist