copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
What is a very general term or phrase for a course that is not online? 4 I'm trying to find the most general term or phrase for the opposite of "online course" When a course is not online, but in a classroom, or anywhere else people interact in the same place, not through a computer, how would I call it? I'm translating some words used in messages and labels in a e-learning web application used by companies
word choice - available in the store Or available in-store . . . "In-store" is increasingly being used alongside "online": "This computer is available in-store and online" You might ring, email or text the store and ask "Is this available in-store, because I'd really like to look at it and use the one on display" If you actually in the store, you have choices including: "Is this (computer) available in this store?" (I think better than "in the store") or
Which is correct? . . . purchased from in at your store From is probably the best choice, but all of them are grammatically correct, assuming the purchase was made from a physical store From emphasizes the transaction over the location If you wanted to emphasize that the purchase was made in person instead of from the store's website, you might use in
join vs join in - English Language Learners Stack Exchange "Join in" doesn't really fit in any of your examples In fact, I'm not sure "join" alone works for example 3 either "Join in" idiomatically means to "get involved" with something, for example: I joined in with the laughter "Join" alone means to unite or connect with someone or something I would use "join" for your first two examples: I will join you for John's birthday lunch tomorrow I
what is the difference between on, in or at a meeting? You are too quick to dismiss on; the idea that on suggests a house call is rather old-fashioned— such a case would more likely be expressed as being out on a call Similarly, on can be used in reference to items on an agenda, and so my assistant might say I am on a meeting, on lunch, or on training if asked for
meaning in context - looking back from now: is it looking back from . . . To refer to the present looking back on the past, a possible rephrasing is: People looking back on the past 5 or 10 years may well wonder why so few companies took the online plunge To more explicitly refer to the future, you could say: People 5 or 10 years from now may well look back and wonder why so few companies took the online plunge