copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
meaning - If vs Only if vs If and only if - English Language . . . It is only redundant because you misinterpret it You say it's the same as "only if" But it is not "Only if", as you say, means "no guarantee he will yell if you fall" The first if provides just that guarantee In other words, 3 is a combination of 1 and 2, and you simply failed to combine your correct reasoning for 1 and 2 into the correct
What is the proper usage of not only. . . but also? Not only did my friend Joe help me out, but he also drove me to the university Not only does my pet dog bite me, but he also barks at me ;-) Not only are there students in the room, but also parents (here, the parents are there part is not quite required, so you don't have to say but parents are also there because it's implied )
grammaticality - Indian English use of only - English Language . . . "You're only a genius" or "He's only gone and fixed it already" both use only as emphasis by implying that the fact or opinion stated is so startling that it is literally the only thing that could be said I imagine the Indian use is of similar origin, but it's interesting we do the same thing with the same word, but different syntax
Correct position of only - English Language Usage Stack Exchange An Ngram chart of "can only do so much" (blue line) versus "can do only so much" (red line) for the period 1850–2005 shows a rather remarkable increase in the frequency of the first expression since about 1970, a period during which the frequency of the second expression has increased only slightly:
Only when. . . vs it was only when. . . - English Language Usage . . . However there is a subtle difference in the pace style of the story-telling in both cases In "Only When", there is a sense of urgency, a slightly more 'involved' writing "It was only when" is by comparision more 'relaxed' writing, more like someone is recounting something to someone
What is a word to describe something that belongs exclusively to or is . . . The question asked for ' a word (or idiom or phrase) that describes something which is perceived as belonging to one person or group of people only' Which 'peculiar to' fits if there is some other aspect to my answer that is incorrect in some way, it will be easier for me to correct if you let me know what it is
meaning - What is the difference between FYI and JFYI? - English . . . Your paraphrase of "simply for your information" captures this better than "only for your information" (which might be ambiguous with another reading whereby you mean something like "for your eyes only") As to the difference between FYI and JFYI, I'm not sure there is a big one
Is it mens or mens? And whats the rule? [duplicate] This only works in the example with "dog" and "dogs" because you can have multiple "dogs " Instead, we would say: "the car is the men's " I suggest that you read THIS page about apostrophes to see how they are used to form possessives (go to the section titled "Possessives")
Is “misogyny” only applicable to men? What is the antonym of misogyny? It's only applicable to "woman-haters" The equivalent for "man-hating" is misandry Hence misandrist n , one who hates men, a man-hater (esp in feminist usage) I also think you've been misled by the conventional assumption that all misogynists must be men It seems to me your correspondent is suggesting that Liz Lemon's inability to trust
Correct use of circa - English Language Usage Stack Exchange Typically you only see it for dates (for example, "she was born circa 1920") The Wiktionary article on 'circa' implies (but doesn't explicitly state) in the usage notes that it's used for dates and measures, so your examples of “circa Pacific Coast Highway” or “circa $300,000” appear to be incorrect