copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
style - Post scriptum in my soft diary - Writing Stack Exchange I know the application of post scriptum in letters which contains information that one wants to add to a letter after finishing it But I'm wondering if writing post scriptum is technically sound after each entry of my diary I doubt about it because I can edit an entry and add what I want to say to it without writing a post scriptum However, editing needs some extra effort to find the right
How do expert writers avoid using I when they have to refer to . . . If you haven't already, read "Journey to the End of the Night " by Celine, one of the best books in French literature You'll see how you can write a masterpiece not just using "I" everywhere, but also making intentional grammar syntax errors in every other sentence! PS: the book is translated from the French at Project Nutenberg, for free
Should one use the legal shall in requirements documents and . . . Option 1: use RFC 2119 According to RFC 2119: MUST This word, or the terms "REQUIRED" or "SHALL", mean that the definition is an absolute requirement of the specification This is also the most current use of the word "shall" from what I've seen in the requirements Option 2: use present tense If the requirements are mostly mandatory, you may also want to formulate the requirements in present
How do you determine whether you know enough to write on a topic? The question is who you want to write for I read one of the major daily newspapers of my country every day The articles appear well researched (and are well written), and I feel I learn something reading them But whenever an article deals with a topic in which I am an expert myself, I see many flaws: false information, central concepts not touched upon, etc The journalists writing these