companydirectorylist.com  Global Business Directories and Company Directories
Search Business,Company,Industry :


Country Lists
USA Company Directories
Canada Business Lists
Australia Business Directories
France Company Lists
Italy Company Lists
Spain Company Directories
Switzerland Business Lists
Austria Company Directories
Belgium Business Directories
Hong Kong Company Lists
China Business Lists
Taiwan Company Lists
United Arab Emirates Company Directories


Industry Catalogs
USA Industry Directories












Company Directories & Business Directories

RELAIS INTERNATIONAL

SAINT-BERNARD-DE-LACOLLE-Canada

Company Name:
Corporate Name:
RELAIS INTERNATIONAL
Company Title:  
Company Description:  
Keywords to Search:  
Company Address: 305 Ch Fisher,SAINT-BERNARD-DE-LACOLLE,QC,Canada 
ZIP Code:
Postal Code:
J0J1V0 
Telephone Number: 4502464363 
Fax Number:  
Website:
 
Email:
 
USA SIC Code(Standard Industrial Classification Code):
701107 
USA SIC Description:
Bed & Breakfast Accommodations 
Number of Employees:
1 to 4 
Sales Amount:
Less than $500,000 
Credit History:
Credit Report:
Unknown 
Contact Person:
 
Remove my name



copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!

Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples:
WordPress Example, Blogger Example)









Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer

(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)

Your Subject:
Your Comment or Review:
Security Code:



Previous company profile:
RESTAURANT MARCEL TRUCK SHOP
RESTAURANT LOASIS ENR
REMAX DU HAUT RICHELIEU
Next company profile:
PRODUITS FORESTIERS UNIVERSAL
PRODUCTIONS ALEXIS-TROTTEUR
PISCICULTURE DE LA FRONTIERE










Company News:
  • \Rightarrow vs. \implies, and does not imply symbol - TeX
    213 Is it better to use \Rightarrow or \implies to symbolize logical implications? Why? Also, if I write \not \Rightarrow, I get a symbol that means "does not imply " But if I type \not \implies, it doesn't look right How do I get the corresponding "does not imply" symbol?
  • Notation for A does not imply B - Mathematics Stack Exchange
    13 If you use a generic → → or ⇒ ⇒ for imply then slash through for the not-imply But you can perhaps do better If you actually mean syntactic entailment (so non-implication is a matter of there being no proof from A A to B B in the relevant proof system) then A ⊬ B A ⊬ B is available and absolutely standard
  • Expressing does not imply - Mathematics Stack Exchange
    7 The formalization of a sentence in ordinary discourse claiming that " A implies B " or " A does not imply B " is outside the languages of propositional or first-order or higher-order logic It is in the language of logical consequences, which roughly consists of pairs of (sets of) − propositional of first-order or higher-order
  • Does not necessarily equal symbol - Mathematics Stack Exchange
    1 I think this is a good point, as this kind of sentence is quite common in mathematics However, one such symbol does not exist yet So you should propose a new symbol for it, with a bit of creativity Your equal sign with a question mark on it is not too bad, but I'm sure you can do better!
  • notation - Symbol for implies and is not implied by? - Mathematics . . .
    Is there a mathematical symbol for 'implies and is not implied by'? ie ⇒ ∧ ⇍ ⇒ ∧ ⇍? Context: To provide extra emphasis in proofs with lines such as x = 1(⇒ ∧ ⇍)x2 = 1 x = 1 (⇒ ∧ ⇍) x 2 = 1
  • Is there no good way to write \not\iff? - LaTeX Stack Exchange
    It always comes out funky, and I'd like to avoid \\nLeftrightarrow Is there any good way to negate the longer \\iff double implication arrow?
  • How to typeset appropriate does not entail symbol?
    I am looking for a LaTeX symbol that means "A does not entail B" The mathematical symbol I found for this is ⊬, however I haven't found any way of displaying it properly How can I convey the des
  • symbols - how to define semantic logic implies and not operators . . .
    In Schechter's Classical and nonclassical logics, he distinguishes symbols at the semantic level, from those at the syntactic level, by encircling the operators For example, formal logic uses quo
  • logic - Not Necessarily Imply - Mathematics Stack Exchange
    No, it is not correct that a ↛ b a ↛ b means ‘a a never implies b b ’; it means that a a does not necessarily imply b b, i e , that it is possible (but not necessary) for a a to be true and b b to be false
  • Symbol for if and only if: - Mathematics Stack Exchange
    When it comes to "if-then", always draw circles In math, you have Necessary and Sufficient conditions Sufficient implies the necessary This implication is denoted by S => N When you are inside S, then, for sure you are inside N When A is sufficient for B, you say "if A then B" and write A => B When both imply each other, you say "iff A then B" or "iff B then A" because implication is




Business Directories,Company Directories
Business Directories,Company Directories copyright ©2005-2012 
disclaimer