copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Lying increases trust in science, study finds - Phys. org The study revealed that, while transparency about good news increases trust, transparency about bad news, such as conflicts of interest or failed experiments, decreases it
Lying increases trust in science, new study finds | Bangor . . . Lying increases trust in science, new study finds Research by philosopher of science and Honorary Research Associate at Bangor University, Byron Hyde, looked at the role of transparency in fostering public trust in science
Lying increases trust in science | Theory and Society - Springer This study begins by outlining the transparency paradox: that trust in science requires transparency, but being transparent about science, medicine and government reduces trust in science A solution to the paradox is then advanced here: it is argued that, rather than just thinking in terms of transparency and opacity, it is important to think about what institutions are being transparent
Lying increases trust in science - vuink. com This study concludes by emphasizing how problematic it is that, currently, the best way to increase public trust is to lie, suggesting that a better way forward (and the real solution to the transparency paradox) would be to resolve the problem of the public overidealizing science through science education and communication to eliminate the
Research finds: Lying can actually increase public trust in . . . A study published in the journal Theory and Society actually proposed a view that subverts common sense: hiding the "imperfections" of science from the public, or even deliberately reporting only good news and not bad news, can actually increase people's trust in science What's going on? More transparency, less trust? The "trust paradox " in