companydirectorylist.com  Global Business Directories and Company Directories
Search Business,Company,Industry :


Country Lists
USA Company Directories
Canada Business Lists
Australia Business Directories
France Company Lists
Italy Company Lists
Spain Company Directories
Switzerland Business Lists
Austria Company Directories
Belgium Business Directories
Hong Kong Company Lists
China Business Lists
Taiwan Company Lists
United Arab Emirates Company Directories


Industry Catalogs
USA Industry Directories












Company Directories & Business Directories

SLOTALL

NORTH YORK-Canada

Company Name:
Corporate Name:
SLOTALL
Company Title:  
Company Description:  
Keywords to Search:  
Company Address: 7 Kenhar Dr,NORTH YORK,ON,Canada 
ZIP Code:
Postal Code:
M9L1M9 
Telephone Number: 4167464411 
Fax Number:  
Website:
 
Email:
 
USA SIC Code(Standard Industrial Classification Code):
171103 
USA SIC Description:
Sheet Metal Work Contractors 
Number of Employees:
500 to 999 
Sales Amount:
$50 to 100 million 
Credit History:
Credit Report:
Excellent 
Contact Person:
Walter Rudnisky 
Remove my name



copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!

Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples:
WordPress Example, Blogger Example)









Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer

(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)

Your Subject:
Your Comment or Review:
Security Code:



Previous company profile:
SOFATECH
SNCLAVALIN PHARMA
SNAPUP TOYS
Next company profile:
SLIKSTIK FLOOR HOCKEY STICKS
SISTERS OF OUR LADYMT CARMEL
SINCERE TRADING OF KBA COOP










Company News:
  • Barclay v Nylex Corporation Pty Ltd - Fair Work Commission
    Ryder v Curtin University of Technology (WA) (2002) 117 IR 401 South Australia v Singh-Gill [1994] AILR 233 Sprigg v Paul’s Licensed Festival Supermarket (1998) 88 IR 21 Wark v Melbourne City Toyota (1999) 89 IR 132 Wilson v Chubb Protective Services [2002] SAIRComm 35 Woodman v Hoyts Corporation Pty Ltd (2001) 107 IR 172 Cur adv vult
  • How procedural fairness can affect an unfair dismissal case
    If procedural fairness regulations are not followed, a dismissal of an employee may turn into an unfair dismissal In the matter of Barclay v Nylex Corporation Pty Ltd (2003) 126 IR 294 it was held that a termination decision was harsh as the employer did not notify the employee of the particulars of why he had been dismissed and he was given a limited opportunity to respond
  • Barclay’s Case - Fair Work Legal Advice
    Procedural fairness (50) Proportionality (5) Protected attributes (3) Protected industrial action (5) Protection from unfair dismissal (3) Public holidays (3) Public service (2) Qualifying periods of employment (1) Racism in the workplace (2) Reasonable adjustment (3) Recording conversations in the workplace (22) Recovering entitlements (7)
  • Employer fails in procedural fairness | Barry Nilsson
    A recent decision reminds of the importance of procedural fairness in termination of employment and the need to substantiate misconduct has occurred WesTrac Pty Ltd (WesTrac) terminated Mr Benjamin Hatch's (Mr Hatch) employment on the grounds of misconduct that Mr Hatch had the intention to steal from the company, despite Mr Hatch denying the allegation
  • Thats Not Fair! A Review of Recent High Profile Unfair Dismissal Cases . . .
    Key Takeaways Unfair dismissals can be upheld where terminations are substantively unfair, that is where there is no valid reason to terminate employment ; Procedural fairness is also an important consideration in determining whether are dismissal is unfair ; The FWC also takes into consideration whether the termination is otherwise unduly harsh in relation to the effect on the dismissed
  • Opportunity to respond - Fair Work Commission
    The employee claimed that new allegations were made against her after she had been dismissed and as such she was denied procedural fairness Barclay v Nylex Corporation Pty Ltd The Commission took into account the applicant’s disciplinary history and found that the dismissal was not unfair The application was dismissed
  • Procedural Fairness in Workplace Investigations - EMA . . . - EMA Consulting
    [2019] FWC 3944 [123], citing Coutts v Close [2014] FCA 19 [114] ↩︎; For example, in Tucker v State of Victoria [2021] VSCA 120, an employee was not afforded procedural fairness under an enterprise agreement when given a heavily redacted copy of an investigation report into a claim of harassment Redactions included certain witness
  • Unfair dismissal and procedural fairness - Fair Work Legal Advice
    This portion of a recent unfair dismissal decision of the Fair Work Commission deals with the importance of procedural fairness when an employee’s employment is being terminated and is subsequently reviewed by the Commission “Procedural fairness [29] Subsections 387 (b)-(g) are procedural fairness matters to be considered by the Commission in any unfair
  • Unfair dismissals benchbook - Fair Work Commission
    From 26 August 2024, there will be changes to workplace laws relating to casual employment Those changes will affect the information in this Benchbook Please refer to our Closing Loopholes – what’s changing page for more information The Unfair dismissals benchbook is for people who need to prepare or respond to an unfair dismissal application
  • Unfair dismissal and procedural unfairness - Fair Work Legal Advice
    Although Ms Wei’s dismissal was procedurally unfair, procedural defects do not mean a dismissal will be unfair in every case I accept Echo Group’s submission that the affording of procedural fairness would have been extremely unlikely to alter the ultimate decision to dismiss Ms Wei Wei v Echo Group Corporation Pty Ltd [2025] FWC




Business Directories,Company Directories
Business Directories,Company Directories copyright ©2005-2012 
disclaimer