copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty vs. Reverse TSA The decision to perform an anatomic shoulder replacement versus a reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) depends on the health of the rotator cuff Reversing the orientation of the ball and socket joint is most helpful to patients who have an irreparable rotator cuff without significant arthritis
Comparison between Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Reverse . . . In this study, we aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of anatomic TSA and RSA in patients over 70 years with degenerative glenohumeral osteoarthritis without rotator cuff tears We hypothesized that the clinical outcomes of anatomic TSA would be better than those of RSA
Total Shoulder Replacement: Traditional Vs. Reverse | Which is Better? There are two types of shoulder replacement surgeries--traditional and reverse total shoulder replacement--that could benefit those patients who are candidates Each procedure serves its own purposes and is designed to help individuals with different complaints or shoulder issues
Outcomes after shoulder replacement: comparison between reverse and . . . TSA and RTSA have similar complication rates, need for revision, patient-reported outcomes, and range of motion at 2 years of follow-up The use of side-by-side cohorts in this study allows standardized comparison between these 2 shoulder arthroplasty procedures
Anatomic vs. reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: usage trends and . . . Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a common orthopedic procedure for which there are anatomic TSA (aTSA) and reverse TSA (rTSA) options The current study aimed to characterize the 2011-2020 utilization trends of aTSA and rTSA as well as assess and compare perioperative outcomes using a large, national, multi-insurance administrative data set
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty vs Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty The rTSA is the best option for those whom have no repairable rotator cuffs, because the “switched” joint mechanics no longer rely on the rotator cuff muscles to stabilize and move the shoulder joint Reverse total shoulders may be recommended if you have:
An update on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: current indications . . . The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) was developed in the 1980s as a treatment for rotator cuff tear arthropathy in the elderly 1 It has demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and thus has become well-established as the treatment of choice for cuff tear arthropathy
Clinical outcomes of anatomic vs. reverse total shoulder arthroplasty . . . Background: Anatomic (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) are well-established treatments for patients with primary osteoarthritis and an intact cuff However, it is unclear whether aTSA or rTSA provides superior outcomes in patients with preoperative external rotation (ER) weakness
Clinical Faceoff: Anatomic Versus Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for the . . . While anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) remains the mainstay of surgical treatment for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA), reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is seeing wider use because it may help offset some of the known complications associated with TSA, including late rotator cuff insufficiency and glenoid loosening