copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
What is the difference between . . and source? [duplicate] When the script is done, any changes that it made to the environment are discarded script The above sources the script It is as if the commands had been typed in directly Any environment changes are kept source script This also sources the script The source command is not required by POSIX and therefore is less portable than the shorter
Source vs . why different behaviour? - Unix Linux Stack Exchange source is a shell keyword that is supposed to be used like this: source file where file contains valid shell commands These shell commands will be executed in the current shell as if typed from the command line
What is the difference between . and source in shells? 2 source is there for readability and self-documentation, exists because it is quick to type The commands are identical Perl has long and short versions of many of its control variables for the same reason
Source shell script automatically in terminal How can I automatically source a particular shell script when I open a terminal window by right clicking somewhere and choosing "open in terminal"? For example, every time I open a terminal I need
How can I source environment changes system-wide? Similarly, source ing etc profile after a change will make those changes effective in your current session But suppose you need to change an environment variable that is defined in etc profile (or somewhere under etc profile d ) and want the change to be visible across all sessions of all users on the system immediately
centos - How is a source RPM different from unpacking an RPM with . . . I am attempting to understand the use of a srpm aka "source rpm" Red Hat Package Manager package From what I understand so far, a srpm is different from a standard rpm in that it provides the source code and is commonly used during development