copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
What is the difference between . . and source? [duplicate] When the script is done, any changes that it made to the environment are discarded script The above sources the script It is as if the commands had been typed in directly Any environment changes are kept source script This also sources the script The source command is not required by POSIX and therefore is less portable than the shorter
Source vs . why different behaviour? - Unix Linux Stack Exchange source is a shell keyword that is supposed to be used like this: source file where file contains valid shell commands These shell commands will be executed in the current shell as if typed from the command line
What is the difference between . and source in shells? 2 source is there for readability and self-documentation, exists because it is quick to type The commands are identical Perl has long and short versions of many of its control variables for the same reason
What is the difference between ~ . profile and ~ . bash_profile? The original sh sourced profile on startup bash will try to source bash_profile first, but if that doesn't exist, it will source profile Note that if bash is started as sh (e g bin sh is a link to bin bash) or is started with the --posix flag, it tries to emulate sh, and only reads profile Footnotes: Actually, the first one of bash_profile, bash_login, profile See also: Bash
Why doesnt my Bash script recognize aliases? In my ~ bashrc file reside two definitions: commandA, which is an alias to a longer path commandB, which is an alias to a Bash script I want to process the same file with these two commands, so I
How do I apply the changes to the . zshrc file after editing it? You could source the new file, which would work for some changes, possibly including updating the PATH variable (depending on other lines) However, sourcing it would simply run zshrc again, and you might execute unexpected duplicate commands Moreover, if there were deleted lines from the old zshrc, then they wouldn't be "erased" from the