copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
How does Pythons super () work with multiple inheritance? In fact, multiple inheritance is the only case where super() is of any use I would not recommend using it with classes using linear inheritance, where it's just useless overhead
Understanding Python super() with __init__() methods super() lets you avoid referring to the base class explicitly, which can be nice But the main advantage comes with multiple inheritance, where all sorts of fun stuff can happen
sql - Create a Superuser in postgres - Stack Overflow The matter is i'm looking to create a superuser with password, through a script which executes sequentially sudo -u postgres createuser postgres with password 'postgres' -s # Set super unsafe defaultz (dev only) sudo sh -c "echo 'local all postgres peer\nlocal all all peer\nhost all all 127 0 0 1 32 md5\nhost all all ::1 128 md5' > etc
correct way to use super (argument passing) - Stack Overflow So I was following Python's Super Considered Harmful, and went to test out his examples However, Example 1-3, which is supposed to show the correct way of calling super when handling __init__ met
java - Calling super () - Stack Overflow When do you call super() in Java? I see it in some constructors of the derived class, but isn't the constructors for each of the parent class called automatically? Why would you need to use super?
Calling super(). __init__(**kwargs), and multiple inheritance? Process __init__(self, exe, **kwargs) Now the super() __init__(exe, use_sha=False) call will succeed, each initializer only takes the keywoards it understands and simply passes the others further down So if you have mutliple inheritance and use different (keywoard) arguments super and kwargs can solve your problem
python - What is the difference between super () with arguments and . . . 30 In Python-3 x you generally don't need the arguments for super anymore That's because they are inserted magically (see PEP 3135 -- New Super) The two argument call and the no-argument call are identical if: The first argument is the class in which the method (that uses super) is defined In your case it's Ball so the condition is satisfied