copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
Safe Working Load - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics Cables, ropes, chains and slings SWL (safe working load) marked thereon strictly adhered to? Certification and retest procedures specified and implemented? Adequate and suitable storage facilities?
Indications and contraindications for shock wave lithotripsy and how to . . . Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) has been a safe and effective non-invasive treatment option for nephrolithiasis since the early 1980s [1] Since then, lithotripter technology has been refined, and indications for SWL have expanded It is an attractive option for patients as it provides a truly minimally invasive approach to achieve overall stone free rates (SFR) approaching 75% [2] As with any
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the management of urinary . . . If SWL presents an advantage over other more invasive techniques in the treatment of urinary lithiasis, it is the possibility of performing it on an outpatient basis and using on-demand analgesia-sedation according to patient tolerance This practice makes it a most cost-effective technique compared to other modalities [19, 20]
International Alliance of Urolithiasis Guideline on Shockwave . . . The present guideline on shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is the third in the IAU series on urolithiasis management and includes preoperative evaluation, procedural tips and tricks, and follow-up strategies, with the goal of offering a clinical framework for surgeons and technicians performing SWL
Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal and Ureteric Stones SWL in situ is recommended for upper ureteric stones <10 mm, and SWL or URS are recommended for bigger stones Distal ureteric stones <10 mm should be approached with either SWL or URS and preferably with URS for stones above that size For uric acid stones, stenting and oral chemolitholysis is the preferred option [21]
Complete genome sequences and comparative analysis of two nitrile . . . Complete genome sequences and comparative analysis of two nitrile biocatalysts Bacillus sp WOD8 and Bacillus safensis WOIS2 isolated from solid waste leachates (SWL) at Olusosun and Oke-Afa Dumpsites, Lagos State, Nigeria