copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
Safe Working Load - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics Cables, ropes, chains and slings SWL (safe working load) marked thereon strictly adhered to? Certification and retest procedures specified and implemented? Adequate and suitable storage facilities?
Indications and contraindications for shock wave lithotripsy and how to . . . Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) has been a safe and effective non-invasive treatment option for nephrolithiasis since the early 1980s [1] Since then, lithotripter technology has been refined, and indications for SWL have expanded It is an attractive option for patients as it provides a truly minimally invasive approach to achieve overall stone free rates (SFR) approaching 75% [2] As with any
Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal and Ureteric Stones SWL in situ is recommended for upper ureteric stones <10 mm, and SWL or URS are recommended for bigger stones Distal ureteric stones <10 mm should be approached with either SWL or URS and preferably with URS for stones above that size For uric acid stones, stenting and oral chemolitholysis is the preferred option [21]
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the management of urinary . . . Objective Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) currently plays an important role in the treatment of urinary tract lithiasis The purpose of this article was to describe new concepts and procedural strategies that would improve results using SWL as a treatment for urolithiasis, thereby achieving better clinical practice
International Alliance of Urolithiasis Guideline on Shockwave . . . The present guideline on shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is the third in the IAU series on urolithiasis management and includes preoperative evaluation, procedural tips and tricks, and follow-up strategies, with the goal of offering a clinical framework for surgeons and technicians performing SWL
Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Ureteroscopic Treatment as Therapeutic . . . This RCT was designed to test whether SWL is non-inferior to URS and confirmed this; although SWL is an outpatient noninvasive treatment with potential advantages both for patients and for reducing the use of inpatient health care resources, the trial showed a benefit in overall clinical outcomes with URS compared with SWL, reflecting
Unusual complication after shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) for a renal . . . Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is one of the most commonly used treatment options for urolithiasis It was first introduced in the year 1980 1 In this procedure; external, extremely focused and high-intensity acoustic pulse attempts to break down the stones with minimal damage to the adjacent structures The shearing force of the successive pressure pulses along with the cavitation bubbles
Clinical outcomes of intravenous urography-assisted shockwave . . . We believe patients with radiolucent stones can choose IVU-SWL in the same way as patients with radiopaque stones do We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of IVU-SWL for radiolucent ureteral stones and non-IVU-SWL for radiopaque ureteral stones