copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
Anyone getting good accuracy out of TAC in 223? - AR15. COM So far, TAC has been pretty atrocious in my WOA 20" Predator barrel MP518 (Staball Match) routinely gets me under 1", but TAC has been more like 1 5-2 5" groups Before writing off TAC altogether: Is it more accurate at lower velocities? Most of my loads have been pretty hot, but maybe it likes running a little slower? I've tried 77 69 52 SMKs, 77gr Barnes Matchburners, 75gr Hornady BTHP, and
Ramshot Tac and . 223 gt; Reloading gt; AR15. COM I've used TAC, mostly with Sierra and Hornady bullets in the 65-75 grain range in Colt 1 in 7" barrels Flows well through a measure and generally provides good accuracy, but I've usually found H4895 will make at least slightly more accurate loads
TAC load data for . 223 and 5. 56 from the source - AR15. COM My plinking load for 55 gr pills out of a 16" 1 in 7 twist is 25 3 gr TAC and a CCI 400 which chronos at 2700fps The initial Ramshot data placed this load as a MAX load which it obviously wasn't 25 3 grains is just barely above the start load in the new data but then again these new specs are for an M-193 power load not a plinking load
AA2460 vs TAC for MK262 Loads gt; Reloading gt; AR15. COM About 24 0gr TAC in the 20" Krieger barrel is right on the node and at a safe pressure that doesn't pop primers In my DD barrels with 5 56 chambers, I don't have popped primer problems - they don't seem to really care much about this hot load