copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
Cosmetics Regulation and REACH questions and answers on . . . Workers at industrial sites may handle substances used in cosmetics products in great quantities, with higher concentrations and more frequently, leading to a higher exposure than consumers have To protect the health of people working in that industry, animal testing may be required – but only if no alternative tests are available
A decade’s worth of wins against cosmetics animal testing Tomorrow, March 11, 2023, marks the 10-year anniversary of a historic paradigm shift away from cosmetics animal testing When the European Union and Israel became the world’s first markets to ban animal tests for cosmetics such as makeup, shampoo and cologne, the change jump-started our global campaign to extend this precedent
Procter Gamble supports worldwide ban on cosmetic animal . . . For more than 20 years, we have collaborated with Procter Gamble to advance the development and regulatory acceptance of non-animal testing approaches, but in order to finally move proposed cosmetic animal testing bans into law in the United States, Canada, Brazil, Chile, South Africa and other influential markets, we need the active support
Review of regulation around the cosmetic world - Cosmetics Design The EU had broadly banned animal testing and related marketing for finished products and ingredients, the US and Brazil have states with animal testing bans and Japan is phasing out animal testing Canada has no ban on animal testing Although a bill was introduced to their legislature in 2015, it has yet to be passed
US Senate passes historic bills to curb animal-testing . . . 03 Oct 2022 --- The US Senate has passed a five-year legislation that reauthorizes the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to federally-enforce animal testing alternatives, in what the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine champions as ldquo;a win for animals and consumers rdquo; At the same time, the Senate dropped a ldquo;dangerous rdquo; provision that would have hindered state