copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!
Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples: WordPress Example, Blogger Example)
Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer
(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)
\mid, | (vertical bar), \vert, \lvert, \rvert, \divides - TeX According to texdoc symbols: \mvert and \mid are identical and produce a relation \vert is a synonym for | and both produce the same symbol, but should be used in the context of an ordinal, and should be used as an operator, not as a delimiter (p54, bottom) \divides once again produces the same symbol but should be used as a binary “divides” operator \lvert and \rvert are left and right
Double vertical bar notation - TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange Also, you have $\vert$ and $\Vert$ Since you mention using a vertical bar as a binary relation, you may want $\mid$ which is kerned to sit midway between its neighbours But that has no double-bar version so finally, you have the option of $\mathrel{\Vert}$ which is both double-bar and kerned to the centre
How can I change the size of \vert accordingly like \left and . . . - TeX I am considering the notation \newcommand{\f}[3]{f\left(#1; #2 \lvert #3\right)} As you can see, the top formula has \vert size as default I want the latter formula, How do I change my command? I can't use the \left and \right command because there is no left or right in \vert Any help is appreciated
Using \big| and \right| versus \bigr\rvert and \right\rvert - TeX I would think that anytime one used a vert bar to delimit on the right they should write \rvert, \bigr\rvert, etc , or \right\rvert (or \mright\rvert) However, I feel like I am seeing these mixed and matched in some answers
math mode - Use `\big\vert f (x) \big\vert` or `\big\lvert f (x) \big . . . In short, \bigl\vert <some math atom> \bigr\vert is definitely better than \big\vert <some math atom> \big\vert, typographically speaking, as it produces the correct spacing in all cases A final remark, prompted by a comment from barbara beeton: For the code examples used here, it's not necessary to increase the size of the vertical bars
Problem with | (\vert) in LaTeX - TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange It's wrong to say that the text should be written \left\vert a\right\vert The correct way (with amsmath) is \lvert a\rvert; \left and \right may be added (but in many cases \bigl or \bigr would suffice, or other similar pairs) The MathML input is wrong to begin with, in my opinion
Spacing between triple vertical lines - LaTeX Stack Exchange For the MWE below, I've actually set the spacing between the vertical bars to be slightly less than what's generated by \[l,r]Vert -- you can adjust the spacing to suit your taste by changing the value of the argument of the four \kern commands
How to make a right size of brackets - LaTeX Stack Exchange At the 3rd line of the following code, the curly brackets appear too big But if \\left is removed, the curly brackets appear too small I wonder if there is a way to get a right size of the curly
\mid or \vert in a conditional expectation or density function? The vertical bar produced by | or \vert has TeX math type "ordinary", meaning that no special meaning is attached to it Quite often, though, it's necessary to inform TeX that the bar does have a special meaning If the bar acts as a separator between some expression and the conditioning event, as in "the conditional density of Y given x", you should use \mid: doing so generates a vertical bar