companydirectorylist.com  Global Business Directories and Company Directories
Search Business,Company,Industry :


Country Lists
USA Company Directories
Canada Business Lists
Australia Business Directories
France Company Lists
Italy Company Lists
Spain Company Directories
Switzerland Business Lists
Austria Company Directories
Belgium Business Directories
Hong Kong Company Lists
China Business Lists
Taiwan Company Lists
United Arab Emirates Company Directories


Industry Catalogs
USA Industry Directories












Company Directories & Business Directories

VISUAL INTEGRATION GROUP

AURORA-Canada

Company Name:
Corporate Name:
VISUAL INTEGRATION GROUP
Company Title:  
Company Description:  
Keywords to Search:  
Company Address: 254 Deerglen Terr,AURORA,ON,Canada 
ZIP Code:
Postal Code:
L4G 
Telephone Number: 9057131310 
Fax Number:  
Website:
 
Email:
 
USA SIC Code(Standard Industrial Classification Code):
143460 
USA SIC Description:
MARKETING CONSULTANTS 
Number of Employees:
 
Sales Amount:
 
Credit History:
Credit Report:
 
Contact Person:
 
Remove my name



copy and paste this google map to your website or blog!

Press copy button and paste into your blog or website.
(Please switch to 'HTML' mode when posting into your blog. Examples:
WordPress Example, Blogger Example)









Input Form:Deal with this potential dealer,buyer,seller,supplier,manufacturer,exporter,importer

(Any information to deal,buy, sell, quote for products or service)

Your Subject:
Your Comment or Review:
Security Code:



Previous company profile:
VOLCANO TECHNOLOGIES INC
VOGEL K SPECIALTIES MFG
VIVA SOURCE
Next company profile:
VISUAL INTEGRATION GROUP
VISSERS SALES CORP
VISSER SALES CORP










Company News:
  • grammaticality - Twice as likely or twice more likely - English . . .
    My immediate reaction is that people just don't say "twice more likely " I am not sure if it is ungrammatical (I can't think of any reason why it would be), but it definitely seems wrong to me But for some reason, even though "twice" and "two times" are generally interchangeable, "two times more likely" does sound OK to me In general, I think people use "two times more likely" to mean the
  • word choice - Glaringly obvious vs. blaringly obvious - English . . .
    With this interpretation glaringly would be the adverb of choice for visual events while blaringly would be the adverb of choice for audible events I feel that both these words, glaring and blaring, have an inability-to-ignore connotation, but that is tangential
  • Is there a word for the tangible equivalent of visualization?
    The word visualization is often used to describe an image or interactive piece of media that represents a data set I am trying to think if there is an equivalent for something that is not only vis
  • word choice - English Language Usage Stack Exchange
    The idea behind something appearing is more visual in nature; it comes into sight What would I say if something "appeared audibly"? The sound of the oncoming car appeared to my ears! Synonyms for
  • Is arts (a subject in schools) a singular noun?
    There's a comment on the original question asserting that in India is often "arts," like the UK use of "maths " I can't confirm, especially since they also mention the phrase "arts and sciences," whether they mean that a class restricted to visual art would be referred to as "arts "
  • Single name to cover drawing, painting, sketching etc
    The fine or applied visual arts and associated techniques involving the application of lines and strokes to a two-dimensional surface The fine or applied visual arts and associated techniques in which images are produced from blocks, plates, or type, as in engraving and lithography
  • word choice - English Language Usage Stack Exchange
    What is the difference between the usage of "doing art" and "making art"? As far as I understand, the former represents involvement in any art related activity or process but the later denotes the
  • meaning - Difference between mark and marker - English Language . . .
    10 In a diagram, I added small visual elements to identify specific objects Should I call these things (visual) marks or (visual) markers? What is the difference? Is there a better term? According to dictionary com a mark is a a visible impression or trace on something and a marker is something used as a mark or indication
  • capitalization - Capitalisation (or not?!) of von and de at start . . .
    Capital letters are the major visual clue for the start of a new sentence However, to demonstrate that this is a matter of opinion, I attempted to find guidance
  • punctuation - What is the proper way of using triple dots and spaces . . .
    This is a matter of pure style I've worked in houses where the style sheet called for spaces before and after points of ellipsis, and in other shops where you close up the spaces fore and aft What matters most is being consistent once you've selected one style or the other My preference is for the Chicago Manual of Style method, which closes up the spaces There are other, more subtle rules




Business Directories,Company Directories
Business Directories,Company Directories copyright ©2005-2012 
disclaimer